Formula One Blog

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Renault Support Single Engine Plans

FIA President, Max Mosley, proposed earlier this week that all Formula One teams should use the same engine, and it seems that only Renault supports that move.

This proposal was a major topic on the agenda at recent meetings of the Formula One Teams’ Alliance (FOTA).

Reports suggest that only Renault back the plan, probably because they feel cheated under the current regulations, but Red Bull, who run Renault engines in the back of their cars, may be forced to toe the company line in the event of a vote.

FOTA rules state that regulation, such as a single engine supplier, would require a 7-3 vote in favour as a minimum.

Neal’s View: Renault feel agrieved that Mercedes and Ferrari have made progress with their engines, legally, despite the current engine freeze. The Regié believe that other engine manufacturers are not playing in the spirit of the rules, but as both Ferrari and Mercedes engines have been inspected by the FIA in order to ensure compliance with the regulations, the Enstone squad do not have much of a case. A single engine supplier would remove another important variable, as we see Renault and Ferrari engines suit different types of circuit and provide more variation.

September 28, 2008 Posted by Neal | 2009, BMW-Sauber, Ferrari-Ferrari, Force India-Ferrari, Honda, Max Mosley, McLaren-Mercedes, Red Bull-Renault, Renault, Season, Staff, Teams, Toro Rosso-Ferrari, Toyota, Williams-Toyota | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Singapore Grand Prix: Qualifying Results

<!– /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:”Cambria Math”; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:1; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-format:other; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:0 0 0 0 0 0;} @font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1073750139 0 0 159 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:”"; margin-top:0cm; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:10.0pt; margin-left:0cm; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:”Calibri”,”sans-serif”; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:”Times New Roman”; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph {mso-style-priority:34; mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; margin-top:0cm; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:10.0pt; margin-left:36.0pt; mso-add-space:auto; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:”Calibri”,”sans-serif”; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:”Times New Roman”; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} p.MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst, li.MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst, div.MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst {mso-style-priority:34; mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-type:export-only; margin-top:0cm; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:0cm; margin-left:36.0pt; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-add-space:auto; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:”Calibri”,”sans-serif”; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:”Times New Roman”; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} p.MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle, li.MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle, div.MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle {mso-style-priority:34; mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-type:export-only; margin-top:0cm; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:0cm; margin-left:36.0pt; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-add-space:auto; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:”Calibri”,”sans-serif”; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:”Times New Roman”; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} p.MsoListParagraphCxSpLast, li.MsoListParagraphCxSpLast, div.MsoListParagraphCxSpLast {mso-style-priority:34; mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-type:export-only; margin-top:0cm; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:10.0pt; margin-left:36.0pt; mso-add-space:auto; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:”Calibri”,”sans-serif”; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:”Times New Roman”; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; mso-default-props:yes; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:”Times New Roman”; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} .MsoPapDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; margin-bottom:10.0pt; line-height:115%;} @page Section1 {size:612.0pt 792.0pt; margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt; mso-header-margin:36.0pt; mso-footer-margin:36.0pt; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} /* List Definitions */ @list l0 {mso-list-id:911895617; mso-list-type:hybrid; mso-list-template-ids:2015501682 134807567 134807577 134807579 134807567 134807577 134807579 134807567 134807577 134807579;} @list l0:level1 {mso-level-tab-stop:none; mso-level-number-position:left; text-indent:-18.0pt;} ol {margin-bottom:0cm;} ul {margin-bottom:0cm;} –>
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:”";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin-top:0cm;
mso-para-margin-right:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;
mso-para-margin-left:0cm;
line-height:115%;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:”Calibri”,”sans-serif”;
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
table.MsoTableGrid
{mso-style-name:”Table Grid”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-priority:59;
mso-style-unhide:no;
border:solid black 1.0pt;
mso-border-themecolor:text1;
mso-border-alt:solid black .5pt;
mso-border-themecolor:text1;
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-border-insideh:.5pt solid black;
mso-border-insideh-themecolor:text1;
mso-border-insidev:.5pt solid black;
mso-border-insidev-themecolor:text1;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:”Calibri”,”sans-serif”;
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}

Final Classification

Pos/Driver

Team

Q1 Time

Q2 Time

Q3 Time

1. Felipe Massa

Ferrari

1:44.519

1:44.014

1:44.801

2. Lewis Hamilton

McLaren-Mercedes

1:44.501

1:44.932

1:45.465

3. Kimi Raikkonen

Ferrari

1:44.282

1:44.232

1:45.617

4. Robert Kubica

BMW-Sauber

1:44.740

1:44.519

1:45.779

5. Heikki Kovalainen

McLaren-Mercedes

1:44.311

1:44.207

1:45.873

6. Nick Heidfeld

BMW-Sauber

1:45.548

1:44.520

1:45.964

7. Sebastien Vettel

Scuderia Toro Rosso-Ferrari

1:45.042

1:44.261

1:46.244

8. Timo Glock

Toyota

1:45.184

1:44.441

1:46.328

9. Nico Rosberg

Williams-Toyota

1:45.103

1:44.429

1:46.611

10. Kazuki Nakajima

Williams-Toyota

1:45.127

1:44.826

1:47.547

Eliminated After Q2

11. Jarno Trulli

Toyota

1:45.642

1:45.038

12. Jenson Button

Honda

1:45.660

1:45.133

13. Mark Webber

Red Bull-Renault

1:45.493

1:45.212

14. David Coulthard

Red Bull-Renault

1:46.028

1:45.298

15. Fernando Alonso

Renault

1:44.971

No Time

Eliminated After Q1

16. Nelson Piquet Jnr.

Renault

1:46.037

17. Sebastian Bourdais

Scuderia Toro Rosso-Ferrari

1:46.389

18. Rubens Barrichello

Honda

1:46.583

19. Adrian Sutil

Force India-Ferrari

1:47.940

20. Giancarlo Fisichella

Force India-Ferrari

No Time

September 27, 2008 Posted by Neal | 2008, Adrian Sutil, BMW-Sauber, David Coulthard, Drivers, Felipe Massa, Fernando Alonso, Ferrari-Ferrari, Force India-Ferrari, Giancarlo Fisichella, Heikki Kovalainen, Honda, Jarno Trulli, Jenson Button, Kazuki Nakajima, Kimi Raikkonen, Lewis Hamilton, Mark Webber, McLaren-Mercedes, Nelson Piquet, Nick Heidfeld, Nico Rosberg, Red Bull-Renault, Renault, Robert Kubica, Rubens Barrichello, Sebastian Bourdais, Sebastien Vettel, Singapore, Teams, Timo Glock, Toro Rosso-Ferrari, Toyota, Williams-Toyota | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | No Comments Yet

Ferrari To Confirm Alonso At Monza? Or Is Alonso Off To BMW?

Renault's Fernando Alonso

Renault's Fernando Alonso

Formula One fans will be waiting with baited breath ahead of the Italian Grand Prix at Monza. It is when Ferrari traditionally reveal their lineup for the following season. Fans of the sport are waiting to find out whether world champion Kimi Raikkonen will retire, making way for former double world champion Fernando Alonso.

Fernando Alonso insists he is not part of those plans.

The Spaniard has said that he does not expect the Finn to retire this year.

“Ferrari tend to confirm their drivers at Monza. I don’t think there is going to be a surprise.”

Alonso also revealed that he thought his Renault team was lacking half a second per lap, purely because of the weaker engine.

He also took the time to dismiss team boss Flavio Briatore’s claims that “at least two more podium finishes” will be coming from the final five grands prix of the season.

When asked how he feels about his teammate Nelson Piquet Jnr. being the only Renault driver standing on the podium this year, Alonso said:

“It is going to be really difficult to be on the podium in the rest of the year, but I do not see it as a failure.

“In comparison with my teammate, this has been my best season ever. I have always been in front of him. He got a podium after a great race and with lots of luck.”

Meanwhile, BMW-Sauber boss Mario Thiessen refused to deny growing speculation Alonso has signed a three-year contract to drive for the Hinwil-based squad from 2009.

The chequered flag had barely fallen at Spa-Francorchamps before it was reported that the Spaniard would replace German Nick Heidfeld.

Thiessen told German newspaper Bild:

“I do not take part in speculation.

“Our driver decision has been postponed. At the latest we will announce our drivers at the end of the season.”

BMW spokespeople were also not available for comment.

However, the Spanish sports newspaper Marca believes BMW-Sauber will confirm the Alonso signing on Monday, after this weekend’s Italian grand prix at Monza.

Neal’s View: Many thought he was Ferrari-bound, but the BMW rumours refuse to go away. I would rule out Honda, but it could be any of BMW-Sauber, Ferrari, or staying with Renault.

September 11, 2008 Posted by Neal | 2008, 2009, BMW-Sauber, Belgium, Drivers, Fernando Alonso, Ferrari-Ferrari, Flavio Briatore, Honda, Kimi Raikkonen, Mario Thiessen, Nick Heidfeld, Renault, Robert Kubica, Staff, Teams | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | No Comments Yet

Williams Focusing on 2009’s FW31

One of the first Frank Williams F1 cars, the FW06

One of the first Frank Williams F1 cars, the FW06

Williams-Toyota part-owner Frank Williams says his team will focus the majority of their efforts on their 2009 car after another disappointing performance at the Belgian Grand Prix last weekend.

The Grove-based team were tipped as one of the favourites to fight behind the top squads during pre-season testing, and they lived up to that when Nico Rosberg finished on the podium in the opening race in Australia.

Williams’s performances, however, have become worse as the season progressed, as non-privateer teams progress more rapidly than independents like Williams, and the team have scored just two points in the last seven races. They are currently tied with Toro Rosso-Ferrari in seventh place in the Constructors’ Championship.

Williams said during the Belgian Grand Prix weekend that his team are not planning any more significant developments for the last five races of the 2008 calendar, and instead will focus on 2009.

“We recognise that we are right at the back of the grid effectively, too often though not every time. We recognise that this year’s car is almost as developed as we can successfully do it, short of a major revamp of all the aerodynamics and next year’s car [with the drastic rule changes for 2009] is the one where we pin our hopes.

“We’re not saying ‘watch out for our next race’ because it isn’t going to be like that. We just have to soldier on and get more out of what we’ve got.

“There are one or two little bits for the remaining races but essentially our main focus is on next year’s car because it is almost a fresh start for everybody with the aero rules. We started on that quite a long time ago and we will see how it works for us.”

Several new rules will come into play next season in order to improve the spectacle by reducing speeds and increasing overtaking, in a revamp that could see any team make a significant jump in performance.

Williams is confident his team will do a good job with the KERS system to be introduced next season, although he believes that building it themselves will not mean they will have an advantage over their rivals.

“It is not as though it will give us a particular advantage. We think, as most manufacturers, we will do a good job with KERS. Patrick [Head] has his own group in the company and we have been working on it for a number of months. It is much more affordable if you do it yourself providing you are successful with it.

“We are doing it because we have to do it. I imagine most people will come out with roughly similar horsepower.”

Neal’s View: The sweeping rule changes for 2009 meant that many teams switched focus to 2009 once they realised they were not going to be competitive in 2008. The 2009 cars will see an end to the evolutionary development (because of the rule changes) and any car could be winning races next season. Although the top three should still be at the front, there is no reason why Honda, Renault, Toyota, Red Bull, and even Williams cannot close the gap.

September 9, 2008 Posted by Neal | 2008, 2009, Australia, BMW-Sauber, Belgium, Drivers, Ferrari-Ferrari, Force India-Ferrari, Honda, KERS, McLaren-Mercedes, Nico Rosberg, Patrick Head, Red Bull-Renault, Renault, Rules, Sir Frank Williams, Slicks, Staff, Teams, Technology, Toro Rosso-Ferrari, Toyota, Williams-Toyota | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | No Comments Yet

STR Extend Ferrari Engine Deal

Ferrari Powered

STR3: Ferrari Powered

Italian Scuderia Toro Rosso’s team chief announced that the Faenza-based team will continue to use Ferrari’s customer engines. With the team’s STR3 chassis performing so well at present, and the senior Red Bull team comparatively struggling with their inferior Renault power, despite using a nearly identical car, it had been rumoured that Renault-powered Red Bull Racing might attempt to take over STR’s Ferrari contract. Ferrari handed the engine deal to STR at the start of 2007 in order to take the Renault deal.

Japanese driver Takuma Sato’s forthcoming test, meanwhile, stirred speculation that Toro Rosso might be considering using Honda engines.

In a statement, Franz Tost confirmed that Ferrari’s 2.4 litre V8 is the main reason behind the team’s strong showings of late.

“We are very happy with our arrangement with Maranello, which indeed is why we have recently extended our supply agreement with them.”

Tost also said the team is happy with its current driver lineup, including Sebastien Bourdais, whose future on the grid is in doubt, despite a strong showing in the Belgian Grand Prix.

“We are happy with both  of them.”

“As for Bourdais, after a difficult period, he too has stepped up a gear in the past few weeks, as could be seen from the fact that, until the very last lap in Belgium, he had out-performed his teammate.”

Neal’s View: Ferrari push the limitations of the regulations to the absolute limit, so the Ferrari engine will always be strong.

September 9, 2008 Posted by Neal | 2008, Belgium, Drivers, Ferrari-Ferrari, Franz Tost, Honda, Red Bull-Renault, Renault, Sebastian Bourdais, Sebastien Vettel, Staff, Takuma Sato, Teams, Toro Rosso-Ferrari | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | No Comments Yet

Paddock Gossip

As the 2008 Formula One season heads towards an exciting climax, speculation increases around those seats yet to be confirmed for 2009.

Toro Rosso driver Sebastian Bourdais has put in some strong performances recently, notably at Spa-Francorchamps this weekend. Yet some Italian tabloids report that this weekend’s Italian Grand Prix at Monza could be his last, with the Faenza-based squad trying out Takuma Sato, Sebastien Buemi, and Bruno Senna for the last four Grands Prix.

Over at Renault, Brazilian Nelson Piquet Jnr. also finds his seat under threat. Swiss reports suggest that test driver Lucas di Grassi is set to test on all three days at the upcoming Jerez test. An evaluation ahead of 2009?

With recent reports suggesting Nick Heidfeld could lose his BMW-Sauber seat to Fernando Alonso next year, rumours in the paddock are linking the German with Alonso’s Renault seat.

September 9, 2008 Posted by Neal | 2008, BMW-Sauber, Belgium, Bruno Senna, Drivers, Fernando Alonso, Lucas di Grassi, Nelson Piquet, Nick Heidfeld, Renault, Sebastian Bourdais, Sebastien Buemi, Takuma Sato, Teams, Toro Rosso-Ferrari | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Alonso Signs Shock 3-Year BMW Deal Whilst Honda Wait

Fernando Alonso

Fernando Alonso

Paddock gossip at this weekend’s Belgian Grand Prix revolved around Renault driver Fernando Alonso’s future.

Italian broadcaster Sky reported that the Spaniard had signed a three-year deal with Hinwil-based squad, BMW-Sauber.

However, Alonso remained tight-lipped about his future, revealing:

“For weeks I have said I will only consider my future at the end of September. My priority at the moment is to help Renault to fourth place in the constructors’ championship.”

At the same time, Honda team chief Ross Brawn has revealed that his Brackley-based squad are still trying to tempt Alonso to the Japanese marque.

“We are just waiting.

“My view is that he’s the best driver in Formula 1 at the moment and we’re happy to wait and hope that he makes a positive decision for us.

“The reason I think he’s the best driver in Formula 1 is balance of experience and ability.

“To me there are three very quick drivers [Hamilton, Raikkonen, Alonso] who have established themselves so far in Formula 1.”

Neal’s View: Alonso has been suspected to have a Ferrari deal in place for 2010. Raikkonen looked interested in the sport at Spa-Francorchamps, so maybe he is not ready to retire yet. If he has signed for BMW-Sauber, then this cannot be the case. Honda will not confirm Rubens Barrichello until they know that Alonso is not available. If Alonso wants a one-year deal before joining Ferrari in 2010, Honda is his only option.

September 8, 2008 Posted by Neal | 2008, BMW-Sauber, Belgium, Drivers, Fernando Alonso, Ferrari-Ferrari, Honda, Kimi Raikkonen, Lewis Hamilton, Renault, Ross Brawn, Rubens Barrichello, Staff, Teams | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | No Comments Yet

Behind The Barriers: Ferrari International Assistance Rears It’s Ugly Head Once More

Ferrari fans, look away now! You will not like what I have to say.

Firstly, let me make it clear: I do not support any individual driver, nor any particular team. I support the sport – which descends in to a farce on days like these.

For those of you that did not see today’s race, towards the end, Raikkonen pushed Hamilton wide at the Bus Stop chicane, Hamilton subsequently had no option but to cut the corner, gaining the lead in the process. To avoid a penalty, Hamilton let Raikkonen reclaim the lead, before re-passing him at La Source. Fearing a penalty, Ron Dennis went to check with FIA Race Director Charlie Whiting as to whether the move was legitimate, and Whiting said it was. Although the stewards are independent of Whiting, he attends every race and knows what has happened in the past. Had Whiting declared the move illegal, McLaren would have let Raikkonen back through again. At the end of the race, Ferrari put in an official protest, although they deny this, and the stewards imposed a penalty of 25 seconds to Hamilton’s time. Due to the last few, torrential, laps squeezing the pack together, this was very costly as Hamilton was demoted from first, to third.

This is not the first time that McLaren have been harshly treated by the sport’s governing body, the FIA – or Ferrari International Assistance, as Paul Stoddart dubbed it. If we look back to last year when McLaren were thrown out of the Constructors’ Championship, during the ‘Spy Scandal’, for using Ferrari information on their car, not many people listened to what the two culprits, Mike Coughlan (McLaren) and Nigel Stepney (Ferrari), had to say. They revealed that the information passed was two-way, not one-way, meaning Ferrari were using McLaren’s intellectual property on their car. The FIA did not even investigate these claims.

That’s not all. At last season’s Hungarian Grand Prix, McLaren were stripped of any Constructors’ Championship points they would have won after a squabble between Lewis Hamilton and then-teammate Fernando Alonso. In what was an internal dispute, the FIA had no right in interfering. But it did.

Suspicians are also raised by Ferrari’s Felipe Massa about this event. At 11pm, a journalist asked Massa: “It looks like nothing’s going to happen tomorrow?“, to which Massa replied: “No, no, no, no… Alonso’s been penalised and McLaren will score no Constructors’ points.” Remember, this was at 11pm, the official announcement was not made until 11.35pm – more than half an hour after Massa knew the outcome. It sounds suspicious to me!

Another example is the Italian Grand Prix, Monza 2006. Fernando Alonso had his pole position time taken away from him for ‘blocking’ Ferrari’s Felipe Massa. It did not matter to the stewards that Massa was not even in the same television camera shot. Telemetry showed Massa 1.6km down the track from Alonso. It also proved that Massa had lost no time because of Alonso. But the FIA stewards still punished the Renault man.

If we look back at the last race, Ferrari were penalised €10,000 for releasing Massa into the path of Adrian Sutil in the pit lane. Ferrari claimed that there was no sporting advantage, and the FIA accepted this as a good reason for a low penalty. Yet if we look at the regulations, Article 23.1 i states:

“It is the responsibility of thecompetitor to release his car after a pit stop only when it is safe to do so.”

There is no mention of whether a sporting advantage is gained or not. Only, whether it was safe of not. The stewards decision to delay the investigation until the end of the race was also unusual. That only usually happens if someone crashes out, or if it happens in the last 10 laps.

So I finish by asking the FIA, what on earth are you doing? You treat the fans like idiots! And we deserve better from you!

September 7, 2008 Posted by Neal | 2006, 2008, Belgium, Charlie Whiting, Drivers, Felipe Massa, Fernando Alonso, Ferrari-Ferrari, Hungary, Italy, Kimi Raikkonen, Lewis Hamilton, McLaren-Mercedes, Mike Coughlan, Nigel Stepney, Renault, Ron Dennis, Rules, Staff, Teams, spy scandal | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Belgian Grand Prix: Harsh Conditions Rob Bourdais of Podium

Star Spa Performers

Vettel (l), Bourdais (r): Star Spa Performers

STR-Ferrari’s French driver Sebastian Bourdais can feel hard-done by the weather at today’s Belgian Grand Prix. With a few laps left to run, the weather changed as rain arrived at the circuit, and Bourdais started his final lap in third position, meaning a podium was barely four miles away. However, Bourdais followed Hamilton’s, and Massa’s lead by opting not to pit for intermediate tyres, and this proved costly. In the final lap, Bourdais dropped from third, to seventh, with Renault’s Fernando Alonso the main beneficiary, climbing up to fourth.

“On the last lap it was a lottery with the car getting away from you with every turn of the wheel. It’s a horrible situation, as everything had been under control up until then. But I am not in a situation where I can risk everything and at the end of the race I didn’t even know where I finished.

“It was so close to being a great result I felt I could almost touch it and so it was a very frustrating way to finish what was a great weekend up to that point. Such a shame, but nevertheless a very strong result for the team.”

Neal’s View: Bourdais drove a strong race, and STR-Ferrari will be happy with the results – but it could have been better. The pressure is still on Bourdais, but more performances like this and he should keep his seat for 2009.

September 7, 2008 Posted by Neal | 2008, 2009, Belgium, Drivers, Felipe Massa, Fernando Alonso, Ferrari-Ferrari, Kimi Raikkonen, Lewis Hamilton, McLaren-Mercedes, Renault, Sebastian Bourdais, Sebastien Vettel, Teams, Toro Rosso-Ferrari | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | No Comments Yet

Belgian Grand Prix: Glock loses hard-fought point

Toyota's Timo Glock

Toyota's Timo Glock

It has been announced that Timo Glock has been given a 25-second penalty for overtaking under a yellow flag in today’s Belgian Grand Prix. The German passed Red Bull-Renault driver Mark Webber in the dying stages of the race when yellow flags were being waved at the scene of Ferrari’s Kimi Raikkonen accident.

The time penalty drops Glock out of the points to 9th and sees Webber promoted to the last points-paying position.

Neal’s View: The rules are there for a reason. There can be no complaint here.

September 7, 2008 Posted by Neal | 2008, Belgium, Drivers, Ferrari-Ferrari, Kimi Raikkonen, Mark Webber, Red Bull-Renault, Teams, Timo Glock, Toyota | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | No Comments Yet